InfluxDB v0.10 GA with hundreds of thousands writes/sec, 98% better compression

Re:InfluxDB v0.10 GA with hundreds of thousands writes/sec, ... by thecourier on Thursday February 04, 2016 @05:55PM (#11037943)

can you efficiently store logs in InfluxDB? would love to read if somebody have tried that before... (just wondering)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:InfluxDB v0.10 GA with hundreds of thousands writes/sec, ... by piran on Thursday February 04, 2016 @08:59PM (#11038878)

We store some logs at a small scale (5k/s) and queries are fine 0.9.5. You just have to be smart how you do tags still. Hopefully 0.10 is the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:InfluxDB v0.10 GA with hundreds of thousands writes/sec, ... by lobster_johnson on Thursday February 04, 2016 @06:00PM (#11037964)

InfluxDB is optimized for storing samples. I don't know for sure about 0.9+, but I can't imagine the architecture has improved to the point where it would be happy about storing large amounts of text data.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:InfluxDB v0.10 GA with hundreds of thousands writes/sec, ... by pstuart on Thursday February 04, 2016 @06:32PM (#11038127)

Perhaps if the logs used logfmt with a parser as an intermediary.

[ Parent | on HN ]