News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DigitalOcean lost our server by Glyptodon on Thursday February 04, 2016 @03:38PM (#11037025)
Between the lines takeaway: hardware raid is dangerous.
Re:DigitalOcean lost our server by protomyth on Thursday February 04, 2016 @03:50PM (#11037111)
I'd be curious what their RAID is setup. I agree and run ZFS for our data storage.
Re:DigitalOcean lost our server by andrewthetechie on Thursday February 04, 2016 @04:03PM (#11037202)
Check out https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/how-did-do-... for your answer. It's a bit old, but still true.
Re:DigitalOcean lost our server by protomyth on Thursday February 04, 2016 @04:10PM (#11037238)
Is it single RAID controller or is there a redundant setup?
Re:DigitalOcean lost our server by ekimekim on Friday February 05, 2016 @12:42AM (#11039751)
Anecdotally: Every company I've worked for that uses hardware raid controllers, it feels like the controllers break about as often as one of the disks. Sure, still an improvement over no RAID, but still ridiculous compared to any decent software raid (md or ZFS).
Re:DigitalOcean lost our server by scurvy on Friday February 05, 2016 @02:44AM (#11040141)
You lose a RAID card as often as spinning metal disks? Sure that's not a wild exaggeration? Sure sounds like one. In 15+ years of doing this, I've only been a part of a RAID card swap three times. Once was just to be safe with an overly paranoid customer.

That said, I'm a fan of moving away from RAID. It's just more complexity in the face of a movement towards simpler architectures. The one benefit of a good RAID card: stupid fast, safe writes with a BBWC.

Re:DigitalOcean lost our server by ekimekim on Friday February 05, 2016 @03:55PM (#11044543)
It may be. As I said, "it feels like" - I'm probably assigning some selective memory bias because when it does happen it's much more of a pain.