Re:UN panel 'rules in Assange's favour'
by rurban on Thursday February 04, 2016 @01:45PM
(#11036168)
no, not all. she consented, but was surprised that he didn't use a condom. which could be legally interpreted as mutilation or rape in sweden. she didn't interpret it as rape at all
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:UN panel 'rules in Assange's favour'
by kafkaesq on Thursday February 04, 2016 @03:54PM
(#11037138)
She consented, but was surprised that he didn't use a condom.
A spin-free version of the events would be:
"She consented to intercourse with a condom, which Assange initially used -- but then he took it off without telling her."
Meaning Assange subject her to unprotected sex, without her consent.