Re:Goldman Sachs May Be Forced to Fundamentally Question How...
by voodoomagicman on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:46PM
(#11035668)
Neither of these things seem 'sociopathic' or 'psychopathic' in any way - maybe 'ignorant' or 'misinformed'?
Re:Goldman Sachs May Be Forced to Fundamentally Question How...
by guscost on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:13PM
(#11035398)
> sociopathic ... psychopathic
I don't think either of you understand what those words mean.
Re:Goldman Sachs May Be Forced to Fundamentally Question How...
by voynich61 on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:28PM
(#11035514)
Asserting that one's company hit a triple when it was born on third base is self-serving and manipulative.
Re:Goldman Sachs May Be Forced to Fundamentally Question How...
by AnimalMuppet on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:47PM
(#11035673)
You seem to be asserting that this is what most "entrepreneurship" is. Can you justify/document that assertion, or should we just take it as merely one person's opinion?
Re:Goldman Sachs May Be Forced to Fundamentally Question How...
by guscost on Thursday February 04, 2016 @01:09PM
(#11035879)
So in other words, on this subject nobody is mistaken, nobody suffers from cognitive dissonance, and all disagreement happens because those who disagree with you are manipulative liars?
Re:Goldman Sachs May Be Forced to Fundamentally Question How...
by voynich61 on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:26PM
(#11035498)
Ofc entrepreneurship has gone up since 2011, silly!
Gallup has some info on long-term pre-recession trends, which blow the recent slight tick upwards out of the water.
http://www.gallup.com/businessjournal/180431/american-entrep...
[1] http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TIMELY_BDS_ISIC...