Re:Destroying worn-out cells makes mice live longer
by purplerabbit on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:35AM
(#11032226)
"Nature is perhaps the most prestigious and respected academic journal in existence" implies that this paper was vetted by what is likely the best peer reviewing process that exists on the entirety of Earth. Which is relevant.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Destroying worn-out cells makes mice live longer
by nonbel on Thursday February 04, 2016 @06:16AM
(#11033236)
>"Nature is perhaps the most prestigious and respected academic journal in existence" implies that this paper was vetted by what is likely the best peer reviewing process that exists on the entirety of Earth.
It would be nice if this were true and we could have a easy to use heuristic. But, as pointed out by others, the evidence seems to point to either no, or even an inverse, relationship between journal prestige/respect and the quality of peer review and journal articles.