Re:The F-35’s Terrifying Bug List
by flashman on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @10:28PM
(#11031806)
Australia's also committed to buying 72 - seventy two! - F35s, as part of the block buy program mentioned in the article. Sure, it arguably helps keep prices down, but the ongoing integration and support costs for foreign buyers pose a lot of challenges.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The F-35’s Terrifying Bug List
by massemphasis on Wednesday February 03, 2016 @11:51PM
(#11032070)
Yea, the suckers (or 'allies') in Asia and the Middle East that weren't even part of the "program" or development will buy these white elephants and subsidize the cost!
Re:The F-35’s Terrifying Bug List
by jrochkind1 on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:09AM
(#11032128)
Well, how much of the money they spend on them came in the form of U.S. foreign aid in the first place?
Who are the suckers?
Re:The F-35’s Terrifying Bug List
by cardinalfang on Thursday February 04, 2016 @07:47AM
(#11033597)
The UK kind of has to buy them because a carrier without aircraft looks a bit silly.
We have an aircraft carrier again?
It's actually a milk float
Re:The F-35’s Terrifying Bug List
by massemphasis on Thursday February 04, 2016 @12:12AM
(#11032140)
Japan for one. When it comes to national defense why would one let another country dictate the defensive posture? That is suicide.
Atleast Japan is trying to actually have a viable solution:
http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2016/01/28/japan-first-steal...