How something works vs one's understanding of how it works are worlds apart.

Your post showed precious little "reasoning".

His post cited well-known differences in achievement between genders. You, on the other hand, speculated on the OP's personal characteristics. Maybe you see your argument as more rational than the OP's because you profoundly disagree with him, but the fact remains that the OP is making statements about the real world (statements that happen to be true), while you are merely making statements about the OP.

We disagree on the definitions of "cite", "well-known", "statements" and "real world".

Probably "achievement" too.

That may come across as fatuous, but it's not meant to be. I cannot believe you want to stick to your statements. Do you? Really?