Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not prime”

Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not pr... by schoen on Monday February 01, 2016 @05:47PM (#11016253)

For anyone following along at home, you missed a D at the very end (0x6D). A number whose hexadecimal representation ended in 6 couldn't be prime because it is even.

(final digit is divisible by d ←→ number is divisible by d works for any d that is a divisor of the base the number is written in)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not pr... by __mbm__ on Monday February 01, 2016 @06:04PM (#11016359)

Thanks for the edit. Of course an even number isn't prime ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not pr... by cperciva on Monday February 01, 2016 @06:36PM (#11016567)

There is one even prime. ;-)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not pr... by StavrosK on Monday February 01, 2016 @07:17PM (#11016768)

And one even primer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not pr... by sdenton4 on Tuesday February 02, 2016 @12:51AM (#11017827)

"all primes are odd, and two is the oddest of all."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Socat: “the hard coded 1024 bit DH p parameter was not pr... by Natsu on Monday February 01, 2016 @09:30PM (#11017318)

... that ruined it for all the other even numbers :)

[ Parent | on HN ]