News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Inside the Volkswagen emissions cheating by bxh on Monday February 01, 2016 @12:43PM (#11013460)
The line about how the engineers view the tests as an optimization problem really resonates with me. When the results of tests administered in an artificial setting becomes the primary method of assessment, such a trend will inevitably emerge.

Take school examinations for example, in highly competitive environments where test scores alone are the major determining factor, students begin to consider the benefits of forgoing comprehension of the material for rote learning.

Re:Inside the Volkswagen emissions cheating by bijection on Monday February 01, 2016 @02:14PM (#11014471)
These are both good examples of Goodheart's law — "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

Re:Inside the Volkswagen emissions cheating by csours on Monday February 01, 2016 @02:25PM (#11014606)
Thanks for that, I remembered that this was a "law", but I never remember the name, and whenever I try to tell anyone I get it wrong or express it in a confused manner.
Re:Inside the Volkswagen emissions cheating by csours on Monday February 01, 2016 @02:10PM (#11014428)
What gets measured gets ...

* Managed [1]

* Done

* Gamed

* "Optimized"

* Cheated

Especially if there are rewards associated with the measurement.

1. http://www.druckerinstitute.com/2013/07/measurement-myopia/