News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Have FTDI kicked-off round 2 of the clone wars? by gsteinb88 on Monday February 01, 2016 @09:23AM (#11011858)
How reliable is the documentation for the ch340g? I don't have experience with Olimex directly, and for production designs I'm wary of datasheets that are translated this poorly -- while they frequently are just fine, i've run into numerous cases where the translation has either introduced ambiguity or is just plain incomprehensible.

And that's the rub: if i get a legit ftdi chip, I have a high level of trust that it will do what it says, and there's tons of documentation.

Re:Have FTDI kicked-off round 2 of the clone wars? by baobrien on Monday February 01, 2016 @11:45AM (#11012895)
Cypress and Microchip also have USB-UART chips that cost less than FTDI's parts and are well documented. The CY7C65213 is even a pin-compatible replacement for the FT232R and shows up as a USB CDC device.
Re:Have FTDI kicked-off round 2 of the clone wars? by gsteinb88 on Monday February 01, 2016 @03:45PM (#11015266)
Nifty, thanks. I've been lucky enough to be able to default to microcontrollers with usb-serial built in recently, but that's lookkng to be short lived...
Re:Have FTDI kicked-off round 2 of the clone wars? by tremon on Monday February 01, 2016 @11:42AM (#11012862)
And how will you know that you actually got a legit ftdi chip?
Re:Have FTDI kicked-off round 2 of the clone wars? by gsteinb88 on Monday February 01, 2016 @03:44PM (#11015253)
I dont. I'm not defending FTDI's actions w/r/t their driver, just pointing out that ftdi does currently fill the market niche of "reliable, good usb-serial devices", and while I'd love for someone else to provide equivalent chips without the shit ftdi pulls, no one else has.
Re:Have FTDI kicked-off round 2 of the clone wars? by ArbitraryHobo on Monday February 01, 2016 @10:45AM (#11012364)
> I have a high level of trust that it will do what it says

Even after seeing them pull a stunt like this in their drivers?