Re:Basecamp neglected integration partners by not providing ...
by iambateman on Sunday January 31, 2016 @11:25PM
(#11009762)
The surprising thing about this, to me, is that an API wasn't considered a core feature in the first place. The name "Basecamp" is meaningful only insofar as there are "trails" available into and out of "camp."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Basecamp neglected integration partners by not providing ...
by carlivar on Monday February 01, 2016 @12:09AM
(#11009898)
Especially since one of the things that I first found interesting about Rails is how easy it was to write your API right alongside your UI code. format.xml and format.json and all that.