News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Scariest, Most Boring Armageddon by beefman on Sunday January 31, 2016 @12:53PM (#11007170)
Mad Max was originally about peak oil collapse. Nuclear holocaust was retconned in circa Thunderdome.

The author apparently doesn't know that fissioning the thorium and uranium in an average rock yields 1,000 times the energy needed to melt it.[1] The ground you walk on is literally beaming with energy, and it's incredibly easy to have out.

[1] 2000 GJ and 2 GJ per cubic meter, respectively.

Re:The Scariest, Most Boring Armageddon by adrianN on Sunday January 31, 2016 @01:11PM (#11007248)
Good luck extracting all the Thorium and Uranium from an average rock and refining it sufficiently to fuel a nuclear reactor.
Re:The Scariest, Most Boring Armageddon by beefman on Sunday January 31, 2016 @05:38PM (#11008488)
Without understanding anything about it, it's natural to assume it must be difficult. Otherwise, why wouldn't more people be doing it? As noted in the article, coal mostly sat in the ground for thousands of years before 1750, when all of a sudden mining it was the obvious thing to do. Why?
Re:The Scariest, Most Boring Armageddon by maxander on Sunday January 31, 2016 @12:57PM (#11007191)
Define "average rock," and cite a source for this factoid, please? I'd never heard anything of the sort.

...While you're at it, define "incredibly easy." I'd gathered that thorium fission was still a hard problem.

Re:The Scariest, Most Boring Armageddon by beefman on Sunday January 31, 2016 @05:27PM (#11008428)
Average crustal abundance 10ppm * 2.6g/cm^3 * 1m^3 = 26g

26g * 8e16 J/t ≈ 2.6t * 1200ΔC * 0.79J/gΔC * 1000

How did you gather that?

Re:The Scariest, Most Boring Armageddon by seanp2k2 on Monday February 01, 2016 @05:21AM (#11010913)
Another interesting movie dealing with post-apocalyptic resource-constrained humans is Waterworld (1995).