Re:Why does the the human mind ignore the second "the"?
by ghayes on Sunday January 31, 2016 @07:14AM
(#11006162)
When you consider the fact that you experience the
the effect even across multiple lines, then this
explanation really doesn't sound as likely. Or, what
you're saying is correct, just applied one layer up.
Re:Why does the the human mind ignore the second "the"?
by fao_ on Sunday January 31, 2016 @10:16AM
(#11006632)
In your sentence I found the second 'the' to be much more apparent than in the the original.
Re:Why does the the human mind ignore the second "the"?
by 36bydesign on Sunday January 31, 2016 @04:59PM
(#11008293)
Clever.
Re:Why does the the human mind ignore the second "the"?
by static_noise on Sunday January 31, 2016 @08:26AM
(#11006312)
Your sentence is not even wrong.
I have a hunch that's not actually what's going on, the second "the" gets filtered out way earlier, before it even reaches the higher features of language processing: to compensate for the constant jittering and shifting of the eye's focus, our pattern recognition modules need to navigate by close-by features in order to build up a model of what we see. In reading mode, the second "the" never even makes it to language processing because it gets filtered out during error correction as an eye-alignment error.
I imagine the pseudo code backtrace would be something like this: "I saw a 'the' shape" > "move focus to next position on the right" > "still seeing the 'the' shape" > "move focus to next position on the right".
So unless you decide to consciously process the line, or your visual system explicitly learns to recognize a 'the the' pattern, the data simply never gets passed along.