Re:Jade, Node.js template engine, is being forced to rename ...
by niftylettuce on Saturday January 30, 2016 @08:06PM
(#11004721)
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11004716, hope they try to enforce that.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jade, Node.js template engine, is being forced to rename ...
by jpambrun on Saturday January 30, 2016 @08:23PM
(#11004774)
I saw what you did. I don't think it is particularly productive nor mature. Aside from that, I don't care enough about either JADEs to contribute further to the debate.
Edit: I meant productive in the context of the current litigation. I am not supporting any side in this argument. I am, however, supporting the right of the JADE company to try to enforce their trademarks.
Re:Jade, Node.js template engine, is being forced to rename ...
by niftylettuce on Saturday January 30, 2016 @08:49PM
(#11004860)
It took 1 hour of my day to stand up for something. It was very productive, reminded me of how to setup CNAME's and domains very quickly for MVP's, and I made a lot of people laugh (and reckon that they too shouldn't give in to unenforcable nonsense like this, especially with trademarks that are ABANDONED). 2000+ NPM packages, 100's of blog posts, tons of references, and all this was going on for years. Are you really supporting these people? This isn't a debate, it's pure hilarity :).