News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SourceForge and Slashdot Have Been Sold by krylon on Friday January 29, 2016 @03:33AM (#10994170)
I was thinking the same thing - it would be really nice if they could return SourceForge to its former status.

I don't feel too strongly about GitHub one way or the other, but having some more options can only help.

Re:SourceForge and Slashdot Have Been Sold by jacquesm on Friday January 29, 2016 @05:03AM (#10994408)
You can't repair such a breach of trust, sourceforge is forever tainted.
Re:SourceForge and Slashdot Have Been Sold by toyg on Friday January 29, 2016 @08:58AM (#10995168)
Not just that, SF's infrastructure is incredibly obsolete.

Before the malware shenanigans started, they could have tried to relaunch with a full rewrite, keeping just the brand. Now even the brand is tainted, there is nothing left except a large database of users and SSH keys (and Slashdot, which apparently is still read by some people).

Re:SourceForge and Slashdot Have Been Sold by siegecraft on Friday January 29, 2016 @10:10AM (#10995596)
I think that's a bit harsh.. there is still a ton of software hosted only on sourceforge. And plenty of people that need the software that don't know about sourceforge's bad behavior. When I am researching random software or libraries, I find myself on an almost daily basis temporarily overriding the ublock rule for sourceforge.
Re:SourceForge and Slashdot Have Been Sold by Ntrails on Friday January 29, 2016 @06:21AM (#10994613)
Not only that but it's incredibly difficult to build up trust as a host of installers/exes from scratch.