News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Outage by developit on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @07:29PM (#10984818)
If you listen closely you can hear the sound of all bower-dependent builds on earth failing in synchrony
Re:GitHub Outage by mailanik on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @07:47PM (#10985002)
why only bower-dependent?
Re:GitHub Outage by jmcqk6 on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @08:25PM (#10985303)
I'm guessing the parent doesn't mean only bower, but bower uses github as the source of packages/code (I don't use bower, so I'm only going from memory). On a build that downloads everything 'fresh' it's not going to be able to get sources that are only on github.

Bower certainly isn't the only thing that does it. It's a trend that's becoming more and more common.

Re:GitHub Outage by rodgerd on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @08:47PM (#10985438)
I was in a go tutorial a couple of years ago where the presenter was including directly from github.

And sitting in a ruby talk when the rubygems compromise happened just after everyone had been told to go upgrade a gem because of flaws in a specific gem.

It's not unique, but it is terrible.

Re:GitHub Outage by munificent on Thursday January 28, 2016 @12:34AM (#10986496)
Unlike most other package managers, bower doesn't actually host packages. It just finds that at Git URLs, which are almost invariably on GitHub.