Re:Lyft Settles Worker Classification Lawsuit for $12.25M
by pbreit on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @01:49PM
(#10982054)
Not when the transfer isn't made face-to-face. And it defaults to 0. So it actually is more like "the European model".
Re:Lyft Settles Worker Classification Lawsuit for $12.25M
by JoshTriplett on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @03:31PM
(#10983017)
I've already seen reports of Lyft drivers rating passengers entirely based on whether they received a tip.
Re:Lyft Settles Worker Classification Lawsuit for $12.25M
by pbreit on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @06:47PM
(#10984559)
I haven't driven in awhile but I don't recall that being possible. Drivers do not see the tips until the next day, long after they've had a chance to rate riders.
Re:Lyft Settles Worker Classification Lawsuit for $12.25M
by st3v3r on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @04:51PM
(#10983772)
So? As a driver, wouldn't you rather go after a fare that does tip instead of one that doesn't?
Re:Lyft Settles Worker Classification Lawsuit for $12.25M
by JoshTriplett on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @04:57PM
(#10983828)
One of many reasons I mentioned that "they will quickly become customary and expected".
Re:Lyft Settles Worker Classification Lawsuit for $12.25M
by st3v3r on Wednesday January 27, 2016 @07:25PM
(#10984772)
So? One of the things about being a contractor is they're supposed to be able to choose the fares they want. They're doing the economically rational thing of choosing fares that net them more profit.
When it comes to tips, I greatly prefer the European model, in which people neither expect nor offer tips under normal circumstances. Pay people to do a job, and pay them enough to want to do that job and do it well. Don't rely on customers to make up the difference.