News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by lazyant on Monday January 25, 2016 @08:43PM (#10971369)
Oracle release 2, there was no R1
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by BogusIKnow on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @01:53AM (#10972209)
I once wrote a paper at university about the psychology of version numbers.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by Already__Taken on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @04:12AM (#10972534)
You must have had a bloody field day with all the moaning about chrome and firefox climbing the numbers.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by eponeponepon on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @06:40AM (#10972909)
Was it published? I'd be very interested to read it.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by kale on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @11:51AM (#10974306)
I would too! Do you happen to work for Microsoft now? Either in Xbox or Windows division?
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by BogusIKnow on Thursday January 28, 2016 @01:31AM (#10986692)
No sorry, it was a.) philosophy b.) before the internet
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by henesy on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @11:48AM (#10974289)
Bump for paper if it's published.
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by JonCox on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @09:00AM (#10973377)
Microsoft are at it too with Windows 10. Sneaky beaky ;)
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by speeder on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @09:24AM (#10973490)
This one is to workaround coders stupidity, despite winapi having functions to give windows version numerically, lots of coders just used regex on windows name... and the regex for "windows 9*" is extremely common
Re:CIA declassifies hundreds of UFO documents by lawpoop on Tuesday January 26, 2016 @10:39AM (#10973908)
Well couldn't we further push that blame to MS' cockamamie versioning?

I originally wrote "versioning convention" but realized I had to drop convention.