Re:When we take turns speaking, we chime in after a cultural...
by gohrt on Monday January 25, 2016 @03:57PM
(#10969881)
Your anecdote is inconsistent with the "universal" short gap, and I think you are more correct. The "universality" comes from averaging that smears away individual differences
Re:When we take turns speaking, we chime in after a cultural...
by developer2 on Sunday January 31, 2016 @01:42AM
(#11005520)
I suppose if you're going to draw a bell curve for the gaps people exhibit, someone has to fall on the outer edges. I'm one of the outliers on the right side of the graph in terms of milliseconds. :)
Unfortunately, something about my wiring doesn't seem to match these timing cues up with my peers. In a group discussion involving three or more people, I'm desynchronized from the others. Far too often when I begin to speak, I get pre-emptively cut off by someone else who "beats me" to the cue. I think I take a little more time to plan what to say before I open my mouth, whereas my peers are ready to ramble unpolished responses the moment someone else stops speaking. Too many people just like to hear themselves talk and be the centre of attention the millisecond someone else's moment in the spotlight is finished.
>> a sign that we’re spending most of our “listening” time actually prepping what we are going to say (As Chuck Pahlaniuk once wrote, “The only reason why we ask other people how their weekend was is so we can tell them about our own weekend.”)
The article covers my beliefs with this quote, but then goes on to say this study proves otherwise. I guess I'm a pessimist.
Edit: As a side anecdote, I am 30 and have a much easier time hanging out with and speaking with 45+ year olds. Conversation flows naturally and my timing cues are much more in line, as opposed to the rush-to-be-first situation I run into with people my own age.