News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Soundcloud for the Desktop by mrmondo on Monday January 25, 2016 @01:05AM (#10965841)
While I agree if they're just a JavaScript app there's no way I'm running them locally.
Re:Soundcloud for the Desktop by esailija on Monday January 25, 2016 @01:33AM (#10965915)
Lol I bet you use tons of javascript apps without knowing it.
Re:Soundcloud for the Desktop by imtringued on Monday January 25, 2016 @03:37AM (#10966191)
So far all NW.js based desktops apps felt worse to me than using the website directly. They tend to use more RAM since they each need their own browser instance.
Re:Soundcloud for the Desktop by mrmondo on Monday January 25, 2016 @03:43AM (#10966205)
Absolutely, let's not forget that nodejs makes it easy to do the wrong thing. While it's great to lower the bar to learning to program it also often results in great ideas that are poorly executed of which I think most of the nodejs community demonstrates.
Re:Soundcloud for the Desktop by patates on Monday January 25, 2016 @07:31AM (#10966793)
> let's not forget that nodejs makes it easy to do the wrong thing

How exactly node.js makes it easy to do the wrong thing?

> While it's great to lower the bar to learning to program it also often results in great ideas that are poorly executed of which I think most of the nodejs community demonstrates.

What makes node.js lower the bar for programming? I personally find it not easier than C#. How is it different than, say, Python, in terms of difficulty? How is node.js community showing poorly executed ideas? Any examples or are you after FUD?

Stereotyping a community is the most unconstructive thing you can ever do to for this industry.