News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon's customer service backdoor by tyingq on Sunday January 24, 2016 @06:18PM (#10964527)
You can approximate this with gmail using the plus sign. Like [email protected].

It's ignored for delivery, but gmail's filters can match on it in the to: address.

Re:Amazon's customer service backdoor by DougWebb on Sunday January 24, 2016 @06:36PM (#10964588)
Every time I've tried to use that feature, the email field in the registration form I'm trying to fill out rejects it because they don't like + in an email address. There are a lot of not-quite-correct email form validation routines out there. Or maybe this is selection bias: the forms where I'm most likely to want to use the + are with the companies that are most likely to want to resell my email address, and they may be intentionally rejecting the +.
Re:Amazon's customer service backdoor by 6502nerdface on Sunday January 24, 2016 @08:44PM (#10965097)
Lots of programmers try to write regular expressions to validate e-mail addresses, but it's extremely difficult for them to get it right, because valid e-mail addresses as defined by RFCs 822 and 5322 fall outside the set of formal languages describable by most regular expression libraries. See this fun stackoverflow answer [0].

[0] http://stackoverflow.com/a/201378