>At which point you're just making the argument for not turning on the Large Hadron Collider. We don't know what would happen. It could create a black hole and destroy the world.

That's unfair. There's a plausible argument that this would be harmful, while there's far less plausibility that the LHC would be harmful.

>There is only one way to find out.

Somehow I don't think you mean "more experiments".