News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:List your accomplishments by bionsuba on Saturday January 23, 2016 @02:02PM (#10959522)
In other words, the audience is completely emotional and is unable to see the good traits of someone because they don't like their politics.

HN everyone

Re:List your accomplishments by afarrell on Saturday January 23, 2016 @02:09PM (#10959558)
> completely emotional

Nope, just emotional to varying degrees. If you think that people don't ever have emotional responses to things or are always able to separate those emotional responses from their interpretations of things, I am really curious what life experiences led you to that conclusion. It differs drastically from my interactions with people.

I actually suspect we're misinterpreting each other.

Re:List your accomplishments by jk4930 on Saturday January 23, 2016 @02:24PM (#10959625)
Welcome to the world of disclaimers, trigger warnings, and safe spaces.
Re:List your accomplishments by afarrell on Saturday January 23, 2016 @02:34PM (#10959684)
What do any of those things have to do with the advice that someone's essay would be more rhetorically effective if they chose a different person?
Re:List your accomplishments by JohnTHaller on Saturday January 23, 2016 @02:11PM (#10959564)
It's not due to politics. It wouldn't matter of her want running for anything. It's a matter of him having so many negative traits. Generally, you choose someone with mostly positive traits for emulation.