Re:Why do people keep coming to this couple’s home looking f...
by Houshalter on Friday January 22, 2016 @05:56AM
(#10952013)
What are you talking about? The standards should definitely be lower for missing children. Finding your missing phone is a lot less important than finding a kidnapped girl. Are you really saying the police shouldn't have been allowed to do that search?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why do people keep coming to this couple’s home looking f...
by darklajid on Friday January 22, 2016 @07:26AM
(#10952289)
I'm saying that the same indicator ("location service claims this is the spot") should have the same result (probable cause?).
If crime1 w/ probable cause means you enter the building and crime2 w/ probable cause means you enter the building then there's no reason to bring up tiny girls or puppies.
Re:Why do people keep coming to this couple’s home looking f...
by Houshalter on Friday January 22, 2016 @08:49AM
(#10952636)
Your argument works equally well against you. Most people agree the search is justified if it's a missing girl, therefore it should also be justified for any trivial crime as well.
But obviously there is a difference between trivial crimes and kidnappings. Inconveniencing a few people to save a life is acceptable. The expected utility is positive. It likely is not for more trivial crimes.