Re:Litvinenko Inquiry Publishes Report
by crdoconnor on Friday January 22, 2016 @12:27PM
(#10954141)
>LDPR's absolutely loyal to current powers. Believe it or not, if Zhirinovsky's a part of a fringe extremist group, that's an extremist group blessed by Putin.
LDPR is not absolutely loyal to current powers. It's just another group Putin has to negotiate with (and has to give way on as often as not).
It's something of a conspiracy theory that Putin is their puppet.
>Why? Putin's perfectly fine with all this bullshit
Mainly because he was actually asked "should we invade Alaska?" and he replied "no, it's too cold" (see how seriously he takes them?).
>Nah, imperial wet dreams of Great Russia, with Soviet war bears retaking Alaska and "Fascington" doesn't seem bother him any tiniest bit.
What did you expect? Putin's really not the kind of guy who whines and stamps his feet even when he's genuinely angry.
Zhirinovsky told a lot of nonsense. He's frequently compared to a clown for a very good reason. That's media stuff, saying all sorts of bullshit to grab attention. Deputies almost never get accounted for anything they say.
LDPR's absolutely loyal to current powers. Believe it or not, if Zhirinovsky's a part of a fringe extremist group, that's an extremist group blessed by Putin.
> That's just one example of the kind of crackpot ideas they come out with
They all do play clowns and tell all sort of crackpot ideas. It's not like Zhirinovsky's has secured a position of court jester. Just consider Fedorov from United Russia as a nice example.
> it's not an idea Putin would entertain
Why? Putin's perfectly fine with all this bullshit, as long as it's not against his own agenda. Sure thing, he doesn't want to be associated with this, and won't explicitly approve of anything, but had he ever reacted harshly? Nah, imperial wet dreams of Great Russia, with Soviet war bears retaking Alaska and "Fascington" doesn't seem bother him any tiniest bit.
> I certainly don't think Putin is implicated with cast iron evidence here, which seems to be your position.
I guess we agree on this, not iron-clad for sure. An iron-clad one would be a recordings or multiple testaments. And those are unlikely to be ever obtained, even if they exist.
Yet, I think, it's well-probable, with high degree of possibility - to the extent we can say "too many factors point to this, so it's well likely Patrushev and Putin knew of this".