Re:Linux Foundation quietly drops community representation
by oldmanjay on Thursday January 21, 2016 @07:58AM
(#10944877)
Was this intended to be a rebuttal? It's really just an unrelated tangent phrased in an misleading way.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Linux Foundation quietly drops community representation
by baghira on Thursday January 21, 2016 @08:16AM
(#10944956)
It is a rebuttal to the implication that the possibility of the community electing some nefarious personality should be considered valid ground for denying said community any representation. By the same token a bunch of corporations should be denied one.
I didn't interpret the post as call for reformed governance, unless you consider
1. Deny individual representation
2. ???
3. Governance problems fixed!
a plan (yeah, I'm being snarky, sorry).