News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:2015 “smashed” 2014’s global temperature record by addicted on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @06:19PM (#10942202)
We've had this discussion before, but nuclear is already more expensive than renewables, and getting more expensive. Renewables are getting cheaper.

In addition, nuclear takes longer to setup, and the most feasible solutions being considered that are supposed to solve nuclear's current problems are all in the prototype stage at best.

Re:2015 “smashed” 2014’s global temperature record by 13thLetter on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @07:42PM (#10942586)
This neglects how the great expense of nuclear and the long amount of time it takes to build is at least in part due to decades of anti-nuclear propaganda. There are certain activist groups who have created this problem and are now disingenuously pointing to the problem as if they had nothing to do with it.
Re:2015 “smashed” 2014’s global temperature record by lamontcg on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @08:56PM (#10942851)
No, even the French nuclear build showed negative learning effects that had nothing to do with anti-nuclear propaganda. A global nuclear build is going to do much, much worse than France did:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421510...

Abstract The paper reviews the history and the economics of the French PWR program, which is arguably the most successful nuclear-scale up experience in an industrialized country. Key to this success was a unique institutional framework that allowed for centralized decision making, a high degree of standardization, and regulatory stability, epitomized by comparatively short reactor construction times.

Drawing on largely unknown public records, the paper reveals for the first time both absolute as well as yearly and specific reactor costs and their evolution over time. Its most significant finding is that even this most successful nuclear scale-up was characterized by a substantial escalation of real-term construction costs. Conversely, operating costs have remained remarkably flat, despite lowered load factors resulting from the need for load modulation in a system where base-load nuclear power plants supply three quarters of electricity.

The French nuclear case illustrates the perils of the assumption of robust learning effects resulting in lowered costs over time in the scale-up of large-scale, complex new energy supply technologies. The uncertainties in anticipated learning effects of new technologies might be much larger that often assumed, including also cases of “negative learning” in which specific costs increase rather than decrease with accumulated experience.

Re:2015 “smashed” 2014’s global temperature record by rwallace on Thursday January 21, 2016 @08:36AM (#10945034)
Interesting! The article is paywalled; I don't suppose you could summarize what negative learning effects they found, and the explanations they gave?