News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Rails Doctrine. Parent comment

Re:The Rails Doctrine by enraged_camel on Tuesday January 19, 2016 @10:52PM (#10935960)
This is a bizarre comment. Rails failed to stand the test of time because it doesn't play very nicely with monolithic JavaScript frameworks? Are you asserting that such frameworks are the future?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Rails Doctrine by gedy on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @12:49AM (#10936278)
I think they are referring to most UI logic being on the client, not on server. That architecture does not require a monolithic JS framework, nor does Rails offer anything special in that case.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Rails Doctrine by enraged_camel on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @12:56AM (#10936299)
"Doesn't offer anything special" is quite different than "starts to become a large hindrance."
[ Parent | on HN ]