Re:The Rails Doctrine
by sanderjd on Tuesday January 19, 2016 @02:39PM
(#10933338)
This paints with an overly broad brush. It almost sounds like you're comparing Rails with the alternative of using no framework at all, but that's not the right comparison. I would probably agree with you if you had admonished people against bothering with any framework that hasn't been influenced by Rails. But most of its best ideas have filtered out into all the other ecosystems, and there are now very credible alternatives for lots of different stacks and some of those alternatives even perform better than Rails for different common use cases.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Exactly. I know Django and Rails... The Django admin is still a huge selling point for me even today. I can get some class of application ready and running in no time with Django. With Rails, with no built in supported admin app it would take me way more time.
This was a good point a few years ago. But since then there's been at least 3 good projects that allow you to easily add admin panel to rails app:
Rails Admin: https://github.com/sferik/rails_admin Active Admin: https://github.com/activeadmin/activeadmin Administrate: https://github.com/thoughtbot/administrate
I know there is many gems but I have still yet to see them used in the wild. My colleagues seems to avoid using them for some reasons and discouraged me to even try them. Maybe the strength of Django is having the admin by default so most Django app (gems) comes with a admin and those admins aggregate together in a coherent admin application.
This is true. The Django admin works out of the box. Getting the activeadmin gem to work for Rails 4? Not so much:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16426398/active-admin-in...
Rails has this available via a gem: Active Admin (http://activeadmin.info/).