Re:Running 50km after 82h of fasting
by pc86 on Tuesday January 19, 2016 @02:24PM
(#10933217)
> That site seems pretty bogus.
I agree, my point was that the fastest "average" time I could find (regardless of quality of the source) was still sufficiently slow enough compared to the 8:00 pace figure that 8:00 is in fact not slightly above average.
I agree, my point was that the fastest "average" time I could find (regardless of quality of the source) was still sufficiently slow enough compared to the 8:00 pace figure that 8:00 is in fact not slightly above average.