News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab. Parent comment

Re:Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab by bovermyer on Monday January 18, 2016 @07:16AM (#10923933)
I was unaware of this. Thanks for the link.

It seems just about everything is being re-written in Go these days...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab by xena on Monday January 18, 2016 @08:22AM (#10924202)
Go is easier to deploy than Rubby on Fails.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab by quesera on Monday January 18, 2016 @08:35AM (#10924265)
> Go is easier to deploy than Rubby on Fails.

You could have said that without cheapening the level of discourse.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab by dham on Monday January 18, 2016 @08:53AM (#10924346)
Does that even matter in the world of Docker?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab by bovermyer on Tuesday January 19, 2016 @04:48PM (#10934341)
Yes, because not everyone uses Docker yet. Some may never adopt it. So long as that remains a viable path, then the matter of deployment systems and complexity is relevant.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab by Ellahn on Wednesday January 20, 2016 @12:15AM (#10936201)
Unless you are smart enough to be a Rubyist.

If you're not you just seem like someone who came to the NodeJS Party late and didn't understand Go is C for gigantic codebases using parallelism. :D

[ Parent | on HN ]