News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A look at asm.js and the future with WebAssembly by mchahn on Saturday January 16, 2016 @01:03PM (#10916097)
> would you say that proper usage would be "reversible compilation with zero loss of information"?

Isn't that possible with many languages since the compiled code snippets are obvious.

I've always thought transpiling was defined as compiling from one language to another language that is at the same abstraction level. Usually compiling goes from a high abstract level to lower.

Re:A look at asm.js and the future with WebAssembly by bad_user on Saturday January 16, 2016 @02:25PM (#10916443)
> compiling goes from a high abstract level to lower

Personally I think that's a silly redefinition of compilation. We should just use "to compile" / "compiler" and be done with it.