News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A statement from f.lux about Apple's recent announcement by DINKDINK on Thursday January 14, 2016 @08:42PM (#10906475)
>I never understood why it was free yet closed-source. It made me suspicious in a way, if that makes sense.

Unless binary builds are verified against the source code (or the code is reviewed and compiled locally), security is not a criteria that's benefited. The gitian process in bitcoin is an interesting solution on how to verify builds.

Re:A statement from f.lux about Apple's recent announcement by hueving on Friday January 15, 2016 @01:03PM (#10910925)
You can just build the source yourself. So if you trust your compiler more than flux devs, that would be better.