News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stateless, fault-tolerant scheduling using randomness by JoachimSchipper on Sunday January 31, 2010 @09:45AM (#1090505)
Of course, you could also randomly generate a time, then sleep for that long. This gives you significantly more control (you can easily specify "wait at least an hour" or "wait at most 48 hours") and is less resource-intensive. (Of course, "wait at least an hour" is not a good idea if your program crashes all the time.)

Still, nice.

There are no comments on this comment yet.