Re:60% of women in tech reported unwanted sexual advances
by wildmusings on Thursday January 14, 2016 @01:27PM
(#10903290)
Yes, but shouldn't you ask that question too? It's extremely relevant.
The law was written in the context of how it would be applied. It was not designed as a metric for sexual violence in our society. It was designed as the legal rules that judges, just one part of the process, must apply once a case is brought before them. And only then in the context of constitutional law and old common law like de minimis.
Re:60% of women in tech reported unwanted sexual advances
by iofj on Saturday January 16, 2016 @09:20PM
(#10917989)
It that's true, it would be trivial to design a survey to get whatever sexual assault statistics that you want. Even after the survey has been taken, by having questions ambiguous, and then reclassify them as either sexual assault or not.
Re:60% of women in tech reported unwanted sexual advances
by oxide on Thursday January 14, 2016 @04:21PM
(#10904577)
The solution is to look at the questions asked.
If you're asking loaded questions, you're getting loaded results. If the results in question are college sexual assault statistics and no one bothered to ask "have you been sexually assaulted" then that's what I would call loaded.
People have different definitions of sexual assault. Asking about specific scenarios is a way to control for those varying definitions, and it's a standard requirement of good survey design.
There may be problems with those surveys, but the solution is not to just ask, "Have you been sexually assaulted?"