News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:60% of women in tech reported unwanted sexual advances by striking on Thursday January 14, 2016 @12:52PM (#10902993)
200+ is hardly a representative sample for the entire tech industry, especially as most of these reports were taken from the Bay Area. There's also no control group (other gender, other industries). And what specifically is an unwanted advance with regards to these statements?

I'd like to see the peer review on this one, to tell you the truth.

Re:60% of women in tech reported unwanted sexual advances by smt88 on Thursday January 14, 2016 @01:06PM (#10903110)
Using a control group here doesn't make sense because we're not trying to benchmark SV against other places, nor are we doing an experiment. This is a survey.

Furthermore, if there are 400,000 tech workers in Silicon Valley, then 200 gives us a less than 8% margin of error (95% confidence level). This still gives us a result of at least 50%.

But we're not surveying the entire tech industry, we're surveying women in Silicon Valley, which is a number much closer to 100,000 (although that doesn't radically change our margin of error).

Re:60% of women in tech reported unwanted sexual advances by brazzledazzle on Thursday January 14, 2016 @02:27PM (#10903741)
Honest question: do those confidence levels account for how the participants are chosen? Or is it assumed that it's random?
Re:60% of women in tech reported unwanted sexual advances by smt88 on Thursday January 14, 2016 @02:51PM (#10903935)
Randomness is assumed for my number. However, there are lots of ways this survey could have been biased:

- women who were assaulted, harassed, or threatened have already left SV

- women who were assaulted, harassed, or threatened were more likely to respond

- women who don't believe in an anti-female culture in SV were more likely to respond

- etc.

It's up to the designers of the survey to control for these things within the survey and/or disclose them. Unfortunately, they haven't.