News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook Messenger protocol in Pidgin by pmlnr on Thursday January 14, 2016 @12:31PM (#10902829)
Was this ever implemented anywhere like this? XMPP can do anything in theory, I understand, but had this ever worked? How bad was spam in this case?
Re:Facebook Messenger protocol in Pidgin by detaro on Thursday January 14, 2016 @12:49PM (#10902969)
Basically all public XMPP/Jabber servers implement this, and it is fairly easy to set up (multiple of my contacts run their private servers). Spam has never been an issue for me.
Re:Facebook Messenger protocol in Pidgin by Macha on Thursday January 14, 2016 @03:01PM (#10904003)
Google used to implement this, DDG still implements this, most small->medium XMPP servers still implement this. For a while, Facebook was the odd one out for not supporting it.

Spam was less of a problem than e.g. spam on AIM. There's the fact that it's not any harder to sign up for AIM than a XMPP network, it's not popular enough and the audience too tech-savvy for spammers to bother, and if a specific host was a bad apple it's easy to BL them.

Re:Facebook Messenger protocol in Pidgin by rakoo on Thursday January 14, 2016 @03:37PM (#10904276)
This part is actually the one that is in the core of XMPP, so it doesn't work in theory, it just works everywhere (as long as administrators have allowed federation, of course).