Re:Ack is designed as a replacement for 99% of the uses of grep
by ggreer on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @05:15AM
(#10893361)
I'll engage in some expectation management: ag doesn't cover all uses of Ack. I made ag because I loved Ack, but it wasn't fast enough for my needs. For the features of Ack that I use, ag is interchangeable. For features I don't use... not so much. Also, since the release of Ack 2.0, some behaviors and command line options have differed slightly.
If you want to know why ag is so fast, there's a summary in the GitHub README.[1] I've also written a few blog posts on the subject.[2]
1. https://github.com/ggreer/the_silver_searcher#how-is-it-so-f...
Re:Ack is designed as a replacement for 99% of the uses of grep
by jzzskijj on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @06:05AM
(#10893512)
I'll take this opportunity to thank you for this productivity enhancing great piece of software!
Re:Ack is designed as a replacement for 99% of the uses of grep
by gedsic on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @05:13AM
(#10893341)
* The command name is 33% shorter than ack, and all keys are on the home row!
Sold!
Re:Ack is designed as a replacement for 99% of the uses of grep
by sirn on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @05:14AM
(#10893351)
There's also The Platinum Searcher (pt) which add support for searching SHIFT_JIS and EUC-JP files and about as fast as ag.
Re:Ack is designed as a replacement for 99% of the uses of grep
by jonathonf on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @06:24AM
(#10893569)
I'm not sure how valid the comparison benchmark is:
Ack and Ag found the same results, but Ag was 34x faster
(3.2 seconds vs 110 seconds). My ~/code directory is about
8GB. Thanks to git/hg/svn-ignore, Ag only searched 700MB of that.
Searching less data definitely is going to take less time!
Designed as a replacement for all of the use cases of Ack. Is even faster.