Re:Cisco Must Be Held Accountable for Aiding China’s Human R...
by csours on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @11:40PM
(#10892353)
IBM kind of claims that their subsidiary was more or less nationalized during the Nazi period. [1] However squishy and self-serving that claim is, Cisco doesn't even have that defense. War and human rights were going through a discovery period from WWI through the 1970's. In the 2000's there's not really an excuse for not scrutinizing what your products will be used for around the world.
Re:Cisco Must Be Held Accountable for Aiding China’s Human R...
by csours on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @01:59AM
(#10892727)
1. https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/1388.wss
(too late to edit original comment, just realized I missed the link)
Re:Cisco Must Be Held Accountable for Aiding China’s Human R...
by cmurf on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @11:55PM
(#10892390)
IBM did that work before the 1980 Filartiga v. Pena-Irala case, which is what enables the remedy being sought in this case. In the former case, those injuries are a part of history, whereas in the latter case they are on-going so it's also a question of standing.
IBM's existant history didn't put Cisco off of doing business with China.