News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:If too many users are wrong, it's probably your fault (2011) by Udik on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @08:48PM (#10891805)
I have a nice anecdote to share. Years ago I was in the dev team for the website of a new major mobile operator in Italy. When the first version went to production, there was a wave of sign ups from customers, but in the following days we received a lot of support calls from customers who had signed up but couldn't access their accounts. We started analyzing the problem and noticed two things:

1) the customers who couldn't sign up had used illegal characters in their usernames - there was no validation in place to prevent this: bad mistake;

2) most of these customers, literally hundreds of them, had signed up with usernames containing lots of asterisks. Many usernames looked like lillo* * * * * or bobby* * * * *.

I didn't give much weight to this, assuming (wrongly) that it was just a coincidence. Only a guy in my team kept thinking there had to be an explanation, until he nailed it: it was the signup form that said "fill in the fields with asterisk". So we added the damn validation and clarified the copy.

Re:If too many users are wrong, it's probably your fault (2011) by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @12:01AM (#10892398)
I've always wanted to scream answers at the self-checkout kiosks that verbally ask if you are bringing your own bags and then make you push on the screen to select Yes or No.
Re:If too many users are wrong, it's probably your fault (2011) by thangalin on Wednesday January 13, 2016 @03:39AM (#10893050)
Out of impatience for text-to-speech systems (easy) to catch up with reliable speech recognition systems (hard)? Or because the system should be more difficult for blind people (or those with speech impediments) to use? ;-)