News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter’s Policy Reboot: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly by nailer on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @12:37PM (#10888850)
If he has - and I think he has based on one particular tweet where he said someone 'deserved to be harassed' - then he should be banned or suspended. Not 'unverified'. Not given a link to the ToS without at least one specific incident.

Conversely, the person whose previously doxxed him - also violating the Twitter ToS - should be punished too.

Twitter just need to have a concrete set of rules (objective not subjective) and enforce it consistently regardless of politics or celebrity status.

Re:Twitter’s Policy Reboot: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly by hsod on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @03:27PM (#10890102)
> based on one particular tweet where he said someone 'deserved to be harassed'

Apparently that tweet was a joke to a friend (another conservative commentator).

Which just illustrates the problem: it's really really hard to regulate speech fairly