News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Paper review: TensorFlow, Machine Learning on Heterogeneo... by jamesblonde on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:10PM (#10883989)
Useless is a bit harsh, but judging by Bazel's uptake, that's the "market's" take on Bazel.
Re:Paper review: TensorFlow, Machine Learning on Heterogeneo... by melted on Monday January 11, 2016 @05:17PM (#10884018)
What did you expect, it's only been a few months. There's tremendous inertia when it comes to build systems, people don't change them on a whim.
Re:Paper review: TensorFlow, Machine Learning on Heterogeneo... by serge2k on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:12PM (#10884345)
With the fancy distributed bits what's the win I get using Bazel? Maybe it's simpler, but if I already know another system then why switch?
Re:Paper review: TensorFlow, Machine Learning on Heterogeneo... by melted on Monday January 11, 2016 @06:25PM (#10884437)
Simple, repeatable builds, almost no learning curve. I do agree that this is a vastly less potent value proposition than "build your C++ in minutes instead of hours", but it's a start. I think Google will offer the distributed cloud piece for this at some point. They'd be stupid not to.
Re:Paper review: TensorFlow, Machine Learning on Heterogeneo... by nl on Monday January 11, 2016 @07:27PM (#10884723)
It takes years for a new build format to be widely used.

There are many more important thing holding up wider adoption before the lack of distributed support becomes a issue: Windows support, how hard it is to get working on ARM, etc etc.

TensorFlow is it's own thing.