Re:E. Dijkstra: Computer science is paralyzed by accepting t...
by yters on Sunday February 03, 2008 @08:46PM
(#108881)
Seems that was the original rationale behind computers, as intelligence augmentors.
Re:E. Dijkstra: Computer science is paralyzed by accepting t...
by michaelneale on Monday February 04, 2008 @12:28AM
(#108960)
Maybe digital computers, yes, but before that a "computer" was more of a job description.
"I feel that the effort to use machines to try to mimic human reasoning is both foolish and dangerous. It is foolish because if you look at human reasoning as is, it is pretty lousy; even the most trained mathematicians are amateur thinkers. Instead of trying to imitate what we are good at, I think it is much more fascinating to investigate what we are poor at. It is foolish to use machines to imitate human beings, while machines are very good at being machines, and that is precisely something that human beings are very poor at. Any successful AI project by its very nature would castrate the machine."