News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Blacklist Forbes? by blacksmythe on Saturday January 09, 2016 @03:14PM (#10872686)
I believe if you flag too many articles, HN takes away your flagging privilege.
Re:Ask HN: Blacklist Forbes? by relkor on Saturday January 09, 2016 @03:47PM (#10872808)
You have to speak up, although it is a chorus of voices that is the will of the community, each voice is necessary. Do not be afraid of speaking your opinion for fear of loosing a button on the internet that you can press.
Re:Ask HN: Blacklist Forbes? by krapp on Sunday January 10, 2016 @09:26AM (#10875383)
The mods have already made it perfectly clear[0] that paywalled articles are acceptable, though. This isn't a subject which is apparently up for debate - flagging paywalled articles is an abuse of flagging, abuse of flagging will lead to loss of flagging rights, and complaining about paywalled articles is off topic, and off topic discussion gets pruned and voted down.

If you don't like that an article is paywalled, provide a workaround link (which many such sites have, so they can still get SEO from the article) or just don't comment on that article.

[0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989

Re:Ask HN: Blacklist Forbes? by relkor on Friday January 15, 2016 @10:50PM (#10914154)
You are missing the point about advocating for change. Of course I am aware that mods allow pay-walled articles, I believe I saw the discussion was on the front page a month or so back. What I am talking about is civil disobedience, Rosa Parks did not move to the back of the bus even though it was the law at the time. Just because something is the rules does not mean one should not act. As I directly addressed in my comment, if you have a personal belief that certain rules are incorrect, then you should act, and not wait for someone else to go first.