Re:Was Mac OS X really the most vulnerable in 2015?
by krylon on Saturday January 09, 2016 @03:11PM
(#10872679)
> because no one runs that and it's not reasonable to expect support.
I would not be overly surprised if it turned out somebody was still using Windows 3.1 - I know of at least one company still running NT 4 on at least a few select machines. (This does not invalidate your point, though.)
I would not be overly surprised if it turned out somebody was still using Windows 3.1 - I know of at least one company still running NT 4 on at least a few select machines. (This does not invalidate your point, though.)