News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Toyota Wants Cars to React to the Unexpected, and Then Ex... by cam_l on Thursday January 07, 2016 @06:19PM (#10861586)
"The SUV driver is responsible for his/her actions."

Hey, that is what ford said about the Bronco II.

Anyway, I agree with you in principle that if presented with the clear evidence in court it would be as you say. My contention is it would take many years and a whistle-blower before anything like that would ever come to light. And there is much greater likelihood of deaths occurring accidentally due to the code, than by design.

Depth of herd is an issue, to be sure, and this even assumes the car could tell the difference between zombies and humans.. perhaps we need a waze for herd avoidance.

Re:Toyota Wants Cars to React to the Unexpected, and Then Ex... by protomyth on Saturday January 09, 2016 @02:15PM (#10872445)
> Hey, that is what ford said about the Bronco II.

Programming is treated a bit different from a tire specs

I get the feeling a lot of programmers are going to be put on witness stands pretty early in the roll out. Lawyers already like to interview Sys Admins.

> Depth of herd is an issue, to be sure, and this even assumes the car could tell the difference between zombies and humans.. perhaps we need a waze for herd avoidance.

Classically, an IR sensor should tell the car the difference between zombies and humans. Herd avoidance is probably a better tactic because of resource depletion.