Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made as a team

Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ... by mpdehaan2 on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @02:18PM (#10852863)

I prefer ditching standups in favor of constant communication, people should know who they need to talk to and avoid waiting for specific checkpoints.

A not-too-long team meeting once or twice a week to talk about big themes is pretty reasonable, but usually I can't even remember what is said in a standup, because much of it isn't things I need to remember.

If it's forced short, there's usually not enough data, if it's it's too long, everything gets tuned out. It's really another kind of status meeting, and I think meetings should instead produce actionable items.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ... by Nursie on Thursday January 07, 2016 @05:56AM (#10857234)

As I said to the other response like this, I dislike team meetings as without strong leadership (something I have found lacking in a lot of places) it usually degenerates into an hour or more of griping and grandstanding.

You don't really need to remember exactly what's said in a standup, IMHO, participate in it and offer your skills or resources to help other people who are stuck, and get an idea of what's going on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ... by mpdehaan2 on Thursday January 07, 2016 @06:31PM (#10861656)

Yeah, those could be bad. I've always seen it done with strong team leads or technical managers when they existed instead of standups. I have seen that devolve though, and I know what you mean.

I was very hands on when running meetings when I did it that way. Usually had an agenda, broke when we didn't have anything else to do, and kept on topic.

[ Parent | on HN ]