News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feeding data to 1000 CPUs – comparison of S3, Google, Azu... by acdha on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @10:27AM (#10850957)
When you do, it would be really useful to include the classic fio/bonnie/etc. stuff to break down performance by the type of operation (e.g. file creation / deletion, streaming read/write, random read/write) and block size.

EFS supports NFSv4 so it should avoid being as routinely limited by server round-trip latency as NFSv3 tends to be but it'd be nice to see how well that works in practice.

There are no comments on this comment yet.