Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ...
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @10:00AM
(#10850789)
Yes but either you don't know what they're talking about (different part of the project), or already know what they're talking about (because you are a tight team). So, zone out. Who's the Punch and Judy show for?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ...
by Huggernaut on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @10:08AM
(#10850841)
At least where I work (Pivotal) where we are often rotating between pairs, and changing tracks of work in the order of every day to every few days, being kept up to date on the state of the rest of the work is useful.
Additionally, we use it as a chance to bring up anything we need help with, or anything we found interesting in the last day, which wasn't important enough to interrupt the rest of the team with.
Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ...
by douche on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @12:17PM
(#10851791)
> where we are often rotating between pairs, and changing tracks of work in the order of every day to every few days
These sort of working arrangements sound horribly inefficient. How do you ever get enough real familiarity with what you're actually doing when you're getting jerked around to something different every couple days? It sounds like being constantly on the treadmill.
Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ...
by andylei on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @10:15AM
(#10850885)
you are in between those 2 extremes and standups are useful?
Re:Ditching Scrum for Kanban - The best decision we’ve made ...
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @10:41AM
(#10851045)
Right - some fraction of the team isn't zoned out, sure. Maybe working on the communication skills of those remaining ones is a better idea, than derailing everybody for a standup.