News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Angular 2 versus React by antris on Monday January 04, 2016 @05:16PM (#10839143)
> Second, when we say React we almost ALWAYS mean React + Router + some Flux lib, etc. -- so all the same things you get with Angular, just cherry picked.

This premise is quite silly. Not every programmer is looking to create or adopt a framework in the beginning of a project. Some people just pick and choose libraries as they see fit and as the code evolves. I've worked on more than a few React projects and none of them use a Flux library or a routing library, simply because they were not needed.

Re:Angular 2 versus React by coldtea on Monday January 04, 2016 @08:14PM (#10840243)
Hence: "cherry picked". You don't have to pick ALL the parts if you don't want. You can still compare a full framework and the 2-3 items you cherry picked though as methods of getting web apps done.
Re:Angular 2 versus React by antris on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @12:20PM (#10851814)
But then you're comparing "React + 2-3 items" vs. framework, not React vs. framework
Re:Angular 2 versus React by coldtea on Wednesday January 06, 2016 @07:32PM (#10855081)
So? Is that forbidden?

Who said those who use Angular will just use Angular only as it comes upstream and won't pick and/or substitute a few libs for third party ones either?

Re:Angular 2 versus React by antris on Thursday January 14, 2016 @08:41AM (#10901271)
Of course it's not forbidden. It's just confusing to say you're comparing React to a framework, when you implicitly include things other than React in the definition of React.